For founders, agency owners, and ops leads. Send a Loom or a short brief of one workflow. You get a one-page written response inside 48 hours: the three highest-impact automations ranked, where to start, what to skip, and rough cost and timeline. No charge, no sales call.
A five-minute Loom walking through one workflow, or a short written brief. Include your current stack and the step that costs the most time.
One page: the three automations ranked, what to build first, what to leave alone, and the cost and ship-time for each.
If one of the three is worth shipping, the next step is a paid Audit or a Sprint. Or you take the written audit and build it yourself. Both work.
To size the problem in numbers first, use the Speed-to-Lead calculator →
This form goes straight to my inbox. Your email is only used for the audit reply.
If you don't match one of these, the audit won't produce a recommendation worth shipping. Read before sending.
The team runs operations by hand that the product should automate. The opportunity is clear, but no engineer has capacity to ship it.
A specific workflow is consuming client-delivery margin. Common cases: client reporting, content production, lead enrichment, QA review pipelines.
The business already runs on a modern stack (Vercel, Supabase, or similar), not no-code platforms. The workflow suits owned code, not another Zapier dependency.
Engineering is heads-down on product. You own the ops stack and want an outside read before you propose the build internally.
Before revenue, the audit points back to shipping the product before automating operations. See /services/ for the timing.
A one-page outside audit can't cover an organization that size. Your engineering team is closer to the work and better placed to scope and own it.
The audit recommends code-first rebuilds, not patches to no-code platforms. If you want to keep the workflow on Zapier, this isn't the right match.
This is an operations and workflow audit. It doesn't cover positioning, copywriting, brand strategy, or paid-ad review. Those are different specialists.